![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:26 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:28 |
|
The 4 and 6 Gran Coupes are sexy, but they make the 3 and 5 pointless.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:28 |
|
Drive Free or Die
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:30 |
|
They're fucking stunning in person. Could not believe how good it looked.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:33 |
|
?
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:34 |
|
My only problem is with it being called a coupe, but that's just my gripe with BMWs nomenclature. Btw I read catch-22 for the first time this summer and your name is awesome
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:37 |
|
But if BMW axed the 5 and 3 then they'd be crucified for getting rid of the "proper" normal looking sedans and puttingform over function.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:38 |
|
They are absolutely beautiful, but crap all over the traditional naming-convention.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:39 |
|
I've seen quite a few and I still find them incredibly ungainly, especially from the front.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:42 |
|
Crucify them for creating the 2-series as the new model range for 1-series 2-doors but then building a FWD 5-door 2-series. I want watever drugs they're on at BMW.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 16:52 |
|
Horrible car? Never. Stupid name? Yes. Makes the"regular" 3 and 5 sedans looks crappy and dull? Yes. Idiotic name? Yes, those aren't coupes just because you sacrificed rear head room for style.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 17:02 |
|
Those drugs must be working. BMW has been number one in global luxury car sales for the past 9 years.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 17:20 |
|
And good for them, but they're dead to me. It's one thing to produce the equivalent of a Bavarian Lexus, it's another to turn your model range into a confusing clusterfuck.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 17:29 |
|
"Horrible car" to me, is much more about how a car drives than how it looks.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 18:38 |
|
Ah I have seen the coupe and sedan and they look a little odd, not horrible but not stunning to me.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 19:42 |
|
They look great, but something about BMW building two functionally and mechanically identical cars, then charging $25k more for the better looking one, rubs me the wrong way. (m5 vs m6 gc)
![]() 02/17/2014 at 22:46 |
|
It's a stunning car, yes. But I'd still take my crapcan E30 over literally any new BMW